Twelve months on – my pole report!

[TF_bakerboyParticipant]

Just over twelve months ago I did a post named ”Three pole info”, in which I compared the MAP 801, the Diawa Airity and the Tricast Trilogy Pro 2.

At first I intended to purchase the MAP 901 but supplies to shops were very slow so I never got to try one.

I followed the advice of Paul Newall and went for a pole which and been on sale for at least twelve months and still had a good reputation.

I decided to buy the Tricast Trilogy Pro 2 and what a good decision that has turned out to be!

To date (touch wood), I have been ”chuffed to bits” with it.

This is the sixth pole I have purchased, the previous being two D.A.M and three Diawa poles.

The Pro 2 is the first pole I have owned whereby I have not had at least one ”mystery” section break in the first twelve months.

To date the Pro 2 has never come apart when shipping out, no sections have stuck together and there is so far, virtually no wear on the section joints.

All-in-all, a brilliant piece of kit, made in the UK and around £700 cheaper than a Diawa Airity.

For me, ten out of ten!

[TF_JohnH]

I too have the Trillogy after 3 Daiwas and can confirm sections do not work loose. No candle wax in site now.

[TF_gaz r]

had 1 and have to agree a very good pole, strong stiff and very good balance.

[TF_gixer1]

Had a pro 2 myself for just about 12 months and can’t fault it, well balanced, strong, and IMO very well made, the whole package is very comprehensive and spares are readily available, ( not that I have needed any) have had top end Diawa, and Maver poles and this is better by miles, would not hesitate in recommending this pole to anyone, you really need to try one to see what I mean. 🙂 🙂 🙂

[TF_redarmy]

had mine since december 2013 had absolutely no problems at all does everything from silvers to big lumps.

[Author]

Posts