Home › Forums › Fishing › Coarse And Match Fishing › Meat shallow on the pole hair rig or not ?
- This topic has 14 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 3 months ago by
TF_NathanWatson.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
26/01/2012 at 3:40 pm #50274
TF_AnthonywatersParticipantThat is the question when fishing Meat shallow on the pole do you hair rig or not ? I cant decide, Ive caught fish both ways but I seem to foulhook more with a hair rig whats everyone else reckon ?
-
26/01/2012 at 4:41 pm #154538
TF_NathanWatsonI prefer to hair rig as it stays on better and I think I hit more bites but if you do better without, stick with it! Must be drawing flyers if ya foulhooking em! :p
-
26/01/2012 at 5:09 pm #154540
TF_shanieboygotta agree with nath, meat stays on much better on a hair so you spend more time with a bait in the water which has gotta be better….. The question should be long or short hair ?? 😎
-
26/01/2012 at 5:45 pm #154541
TF_NathanWatsonI like a gap of about 6mm.
-
26/01/2012 at 5:51 pm #154542
TF_baitchefParticipanti think it depends what your fishing for really, I used to fish a small lake that was solid with little carp and hair rigging was a waste of time.
-
27/01/2012 at 10:49 am #154563
TF_craigoI reckon hair rigging produces more hit bites and it stays on better but over the last summer, I really noticed the fish wising up to hair rigged meat fished shallow and using it directly on the hook worked better so I would say largely depends on the venue and how much pressure it gets
-
27/01/2012 at 1:14 pm #154569
TF_AnthonywatersParticipantThanks for responses, im fishing for carp to 3lb & decent silvers, I dont have an issue with either method, just wanted a topical discussion on what works, personally I fish a 6mm piece of plumrose on an 18 911 spade end ( barbless of course) and I catch like this, when i do hair rig i experience my foul hooked fish is that down to more hook being exposed on the presentation ?
-
27/01/2012 at 1:32 pm #154572
TF_shanieboyif its not predominately carp but also decent roach and skimmers then, straight on the hook would be my first choice on a 16 B911, if it was all carp then the hair….. 5mm gap size16 PR36
-
28/01/2012 at 9:03 pm #154632
TF_AnthonywatersParticipantThanks for the replies, alot of the replies mirrored what I was thinking and doing already, I do tend to fish meat more on the hook when fishing shallow but I was speaking to a lad at WA last March, id just won my section and he reckoned Id have had alot more fish hair rigging, when your looking at 70lb of skimmers shallow would hair rigging have given me that edge ? would it have speeded things up that much more for me ?
-
28/01/2012 at 10:34 pm #154637
TF_paulDI tried hair rigging paste and meat at full depth last summer as you would think it must be better. Was a foulhooking nightmare! I hooked loads of fish but not many in the mouth. Maybe its because theres no bolt effect.
-
29/01/2012 at 10:57 am #154649
TF_AnthonywatersParticipantPaul im starting to think hair rigging is not always the way especially pole fishing, I messed about 3 years ago, I tried fishing every bloody thing in a hair, meat / pellet on the deck in a hair, long pole and corn fishing in a hair, my fishing went downhill as a result. Im not saying it doest work because bomb and pellet/meat/corn theres no better way and for fishing hard pellet up in the air, but hair rig on the deck I dont fully subscribe to.
-
29/01/2012 at 1:46 pm #154654
TF_shanieboyAgreed, on the bomb there’s no better way, but in my experience on the pole or on the wag fishing the hard pellet i have found that banding the pellet then hooking the band the best way by far for hitting more bites. Im not really sure why tho, as the presentation on the hair looks and hangs so much better :confused: Iv tried different length hairs and hook size/ patterns etc but still end up connecting to more fish using a small hook, hooking the band directly??
Any thoughts why?? Or have others found it to be the opposite??
-
30/01/2012 at 1:58 pm #154693
TF_NathanWatson@shanieboy wrote:
Agreed, on the bomb there’s no better way, but in my experience on the pole or on the wag fishing the hard pellet i have found that banding the pellet then hooking the band the best way by far for hitting more bites. Im not really sure why tho, as the presentation on the hair looks and hangs so much better :confused: Iv tried different length hairs and hook size/ patterns etc but still end up connecting to more fish using a small hook, hooking the band directly??
Any thoughts why?? Or have others found it to be the opposite??
I’ve found the opposite! Definetely loose a lot more fish putting a band on the hook. I have no problems with hairs on the pole shallow and waggler.
-
30/01/2012 at 2:22 pm #154694
TF_shanieboyRe reading my last post it prob came acrosss wrong, im talking about hooking the band only when fishing the hard pellet on the deck, on either the pole or the wag. When fishing shallow on both id use the hair obviously…..
Nath, when fishing on the deck on the wag, would you use a hair? If yes what would be your normal setup if you dont mind me picking your brains?? I have tried both PR36 and B911 hooks in 18 and 16 with a hair/micro band either just touching the hook or 4//5mm off and still end up missing bites. Im fishing with the pellet just touching bottom acting as the last dropper.
-
30/01/2012 at 2:30 pm #154696
TF_NathanWatsonI don’t often fish the waggler on the deck but use the same hooks and hairs as for fishing shallow, 20 Fox series 2 and an 8mm hair, no shot down the line.
-
-
AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

